Secureframe is a compliance management platform aimed at early to mid-stage companies that want a fast path to certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and CCPA. Think templates, guided setup, and a big library of integrations that help teams replace screenshots with automated evidence pulls. The experience is intentionally simple, which is why many first-time compliance teams pick it.
Out-of-the-box policies and control mappings for major frameworks
300+ integrations covering cloud, HR, and identity providers
Clean interface with low learning curve
Fast setup for standard SaaS stacks
Less granular insight into why specific checks fail
Some integrations can be finicky and need manual intervention
Broad alerts can create noise, including occasional false positives
Less flexible for complex multi-framework or multi-entity setups
Delve is an AI-forward compliance platform designed for fast onboarding and deep automation across live workflows. Rather than lean on static checklists, Delve uses agents that capture evidence from real activity, scan code and infra for policy drift, and prefill vendor questionnaires from your compliance context. It appeals to teams that want speed, smart assistance, and high-touch support.
AI agents that automate evidence capture, even for custom stacks
Real-time monitoring across infra and code with proactive risk surfacing
24/7 access to real experts via Slack and Zoom for hands-on help
Trust report and audit prep that aim to reduce last-mile scramble
Fewer native integrations than older platforms, so some coverage relies on agents or APIs
Rapidly evolving product that may require iteration on advanced features
Pricing is custom and often sits in the mid to upper bracket
| Category | Secureframe | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Fast, template-led compliance for common frameworks | AI-assisted automation tied to real workflows |
| Framework coverage | 35+ frameworks with ready templates | Core standards plus custom programs, exact count not public |
| Automation depth | Strong for checklists and evidence via integrations | Deeper automation with AI agents, browser actions, and rules |
| Integrations | 300+, broad coverage for cloud and HR | About 100+ and growing, strong APIs for custom checks |
| Evidence handling | Auto-pulls where supported, manual uploads to fill gaps | Automated capture from apps, CI, and browser agents |
| Continuous monitoring | Good control checks through integrations | Real-time alerts, predictive risk signals, code plus infra |
| Risk management | Solid register and tracking, more manual ownership | Dynamic scoring, custom workflows, risk to control mapping |
| Audit experience | Partner console for auditors, structured tasks | High-touch audit management with expert support |
| Support model | Guided onboarding plus knowledge base and partners | 24/7 human support in Slack and Zoom, hands-on help |
| Typical buyer | First-time teams closing deals with one or two frameworks | Fast-growing teams with custom stacks and tight timelines |
Provides guided templates, a clean checklist, and self-serve docs. Your team does more of the setup, so pace depends on internal bandwidth. Strong fit for straightforward environments.
Uses an AI-native interface and assigns specialists who help map workflows and close gaps. Teams often report full setup in days, with expert help reducing back and forth.
Verdict: Secureframe is great if you prefer a familiar, checklist-style start. Delve is better when you want a co-pilot sitting next to you, cutting setup time with hands-on guidance.
Captures evidence automatically from 300+ integrations. Where no connector exists, manual uploads are required. Coverage is broad but may need workarounds for custom tools.
Uses AI agents to pull evidence from live workflows, browser actions, and CI/CD pipelines. This approach handles custom stacks without needing pre-built connectors.
Verdict: Delve has the edge on breadth of capture methods. Secureframe is sufficient if you are mostly plug-and-play.
Monitors connected systems and flags control failures. Alerts are reliable for common scenarios, though some users want more context and fewer false positives.
Emphasizes live signals. It prioritizes issues based on likelihood and impact and ties alerts to remediation in tools like Jira to reduce drift between audits.
Verdict: Delve for teams that want always-on monitoring with richer context. Secureframe for steady, integration-led checks without heavy tuning.
Offers a clean risk register, ownership, and status tracking. Good enough for audit documentation and leadership visibility.
Adds dynamic scoring, custom formulas, and direct mapping from risks to controls and evidence. Better fit when risk posture changes quickly.
Verdict: Secureframe keeps risk simple. Delve gives you full risk analytics.
Centralizes vendor records, documents, and review cycles. You can keep third-party artifacts in one place for audits.
Speeds vendor reviews with AI autofill for questionnaires, uses your existing compliance context, and monitors vendor access for changes.
Verdict: Secureframe for orderly vendor files and periodic reviews. Delve for faster questionnaires and continuous vendor risk signals.
Wins on raw count. Coverage across clouds, HRIS, IdP, and endpoint tools is broad, which shortens setup for common stacks.
Supports fewer ready connectors but compensates with agents and APIs that work in custom environments.
Verdict: If your stack matches the integration catalog, Secureframe feels easy. If you have bespoke systems or internal apps, Delve's agent approach can be faster overall.
Standardizes auditor collaboration with a partner console, structured tasks, and status. It keeps things tidy when your team drives the process.
Pairs you with real experts, manages timelines, and provides live support during busy weeks. Many teams find this reduces last-mile stress.
Verdict: Run it yourself with Secureframe. Offload the coordination with Delve.
A simple, well-trodden path to your first SOC 2 or ISO 27001
A large library of templates and integrations that align with a standard SaaS stack
A clean interface and light learning curve for non-security teams
Predictable pricing for one or two certifications a year and a self-managed audit style
Handle some manual uploads for niche systems
See less context in certain alerts
Do more of the coordination during audit weeks
AI-driven evidence capture that adapts to your exact workflows
24/7 expert access for onboarding, audits, and vendor demands
Real-time monitoring across code and infra with issue prioritization
Faster questionnaires and tighter vendor access oversight
Rely on agents or APIs when native connectors are not available
Work with a newer product that is evolving quickly
Need upfront time to align AI rules and review outputs
| Feature | Secureframe | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| Supported frameworks | 35+ with ready templates | Core standards plus custom programs |
| Automation coverage | Checklist automation and auto evidence via integrations | AI agents for capture, CI plus infra scans, browser actions |
| Evidence gaps | Manual uploads for niche systems | Agents and APIs handle most custom scenarios |
| Monitoring | Integration-driven checks and alerts | Real-time, context-rich alerts with prioritization |
| Risk management | Register, owners, status | Dynamic scoring, custom formulas, risk to control mapping |
| Vendor reviews | Centralized repository and periodic reviews | Autofill questionnaires and continuous access oversight |
| Audit support | Auditor console and task workflows | High-touch help with experts on call |
Neither vendor posts full public pricing for every tier. What shapes total cost in practice:
Tends to be friendly for first certifications. Costs can rise with more frameworks and premium add-ons, but remain predictable for smaller scopes.
Usually lands higher per year, but many teams recoup value through reduced manual lift, faster audits, and fewer outside consulting hours.
Secureframe is a strong fit for teams that want speed and simplicity for a first or second certification and prefer to run a self-managed audit with a familiar integration catalog. It is straightforward, widely adopted, and easy to explain to non-security stakeholders.
Delve is a better match for teams that value AI-assisted automation, need to cover custom stacks without babysitting connectors, and want high-touch help during onboarding and audits. If you live in code and infra and you want compliance to follow the work automatically, Delve's model will feel modern and fast.
If your roadmap includes two or more frameworks, custom internal systems, and strict timelines, Delve's automation depth and expert support can deliver outsized ROI. If you just need to get SOC 2 or ISO 27001 done well with minimal change management, Secureframe will get you there cleanly.
Startups that want to ramp up by achieving ISO 27001 quickly often choose Smartly because:
Most teams reach audit readiness in 15 to 30 days with clause-by-clause guidance and mock audit scoring.
You pay to get certified, not for a string of services along the way. Certification fees and internal audit are covered.
Transparent pricing and APAC time zone support keep the project lean while your team focuses on shipping.
If ISO 27001 is the milestone blocking your next deal, Smartly gives you a focused, guided path that removes the uncertainty and gets you to certified with confidence.